A joint conference offered by the African Union for Housing Finance
and the Bank of Tanzania’s Housing Finance Programme
8 – 10 October 2012
Bank of Tanzania Conference Centre, 10 Mirambo Street, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
Africa’s rapidly developing economies and cities offer tremendous
opportunities, and challenges, for housing development and investment.
Urbanisation rates in Africa are the highest in the world, and positive
growth over the last decade has put many countries in a position to
assertively address the housing situations of their populations. While
the mortgage sector remains small, developments in many countries
suggests that this is changing. Housing practitioners across the
continent are beginning to grapple with and understand the opportunities
available and are developing precisely targeted products and
projects. Their work begins to chart pathways for new entrants into
the sector, and this will contribute towards the growth of the housing
sector across the continent. Governments, too, are recognising the
integral role of housing in overall economic growth, and are addressing
the regulatory and policy constraints to housing investment, opening
up further opportunities for growth.
To showcase and promote these opportunities, the African Union for
Housing Finance and the Housing Finance Programme of the Bank of
Tanzania have joined forces to offer a conference with the theme “Growing Housing Opportunities in Africa: Encouraging Investment and Growing the Market”.
It is fortuitous to offer the conference in Dar es Salaam, Tanzania,
where the Ministry of Lands, Housing and Human Settlements Development
and the Bank of Tanzania are working together in a partnership with the
World Bank, and with the private sector, to grow housing opportunities
in a focused way. Tanzania’s experiences in growing its mortgage
market and promoting the delivery of affordable housing, while also
actively addressing the market where mortgages cannot go, will be
showcased. The experiences in Tanzania will be of particular interest
to other countries exploring the potential of a mortgage liquidity
facility, or who have already ventured on this path and wish to consider
alternative approaches to the concept. The first day will focus on
ways to encourage investor interest, through the development of
sustainable investment models, the collection of data and the
development of lender track records.
The focus of the second day is on growing the market through the
development of niche market interventions and products that meet the
breadth of the housing need. The day starts with a showcase of
successful developments in progress – delegates will be invited to
choose four, of up to ten projects, which will be presented
simultaneously in a “housing developments marketplace”. This is
followed by a session exploring different ways in which the needs of the
low-income population can be served – from the provision of
micro-mortgages through to sustainable housing microfinance. The
different examples offer housing practitioners useful insight into
opportunities for their own growth and development.
This conference will enable delegates to define their own role in
growing housing opportunities in Africa. Whether delegates are
government officials, investors, developers, lenders or members of civil
society, the conference will offer each participant useful insights
and evidence for promoting housing in their own local contexts.
The concept of fast, cheap, integrated housing is fleeting unless it is strictly regulated, flexible and profitable to do so. Due to low cost construction, sub-standard design and low maintenance, housing in this range often results in overcrowded, unsightly and unhygienic conditions. Inevitably, neighboring real estate values fall, squatter or slums might develop and incidences of petty crime might increase.
Wednesday, 5 September 2012
Monday, 23 July 2012
Hong Kong plans to ramp up new flats to 50,000 a year
HONG
KONG - Space-starved Hong Kongers could see a steep ramp-up in the
number of new flats built - to the tune of 50,000 a year, if a key aide
to new leader Leung Chun Ying has his way.
If
realised, it will be the highest number seen in Hong Kong over the past
two decades, and will certainly bring to a screeching halt the spike in
property prices, which have soared 80 per cent in the last three years
alone.
It
marks a huge jump from the 18,000 flats that were built in the last
fiscal year ending March, and outstrips the 35,000 goal set by the
previous Donald Tsang government for the coming years.
In
an interview with The Straits Times, Mr Barry Cheung, who chaired Mr
Leung's election campaign and is now a member of his executive council,
said: 'I think we have to provide significantly more flats than what we
did in the last five years.
'We need to get it up to at least 50,000 a year.'
Mr
Leung has made housing a key platform of his government and has pledged
to release more land. But he has not said how many homes they will
provide for.
Mr
Cheung's view - he is also the chairman of Hong Kong's Urban Renewal
Authority - provides a hint of the parameters that the new
administration is considering.
But flooding the market with 50,000 units a year invokes fears of plummeting property prices.
In
1997, Hong Kong's first chief executive Tung Chee Hwa promised to build
85,000 flats annually - reportedly Mr Leung's idea. But the policy
collapsed when market sentiment went south and Hong Kong was hit by the
Asian financial crisis.
Mr
Cheung says that what is needed this time is for the government to step
in with more public housing to buffer private home owners from the
impact.
Private
homes comprise over half - 52 per cent - of the market in Hong Kong.
About 30 per cent live in public rental flats, while the remaining 18
per cent live in flats the government sells at discounted prices.
Of his proposed pipeline of new homes, less than half - about 20,000 - would be private homes. The rest would be public housing.
At
the bottom, more rental flats would be built - some 176,000 applicants
are now on the waiting list. The government will build 15,000 such flats
a year.
The
second tier is the subsidised homes under the Home Ownership Scheme
(HOS) for low-income families earning below HK$30,000 (S$5,000) a month.
There is a planning target of 5,000 a year.
Mr
Cheung says that a third tier needs to be created, for what he calls
'the typical middle class' - those who earn too much to qualify for HOS
but cannot afford private homes. This way, needs can be met 'without
necessarily bringing down the private market'.
It
will take three or four years to realise this plan of building more
flats, but genuine buyers will be able to enter the market before then,
he adds.
'If
investors see that down the road, there will be increased supply, they
will be less inclined to speculate and that takes demand out of the
market today. So more end-users would be able to go in,' he notes.
Such
a proposal would benefit the many Hong Kongers - about 100,000 live in
homes such as garrets and bed-space flats - on the hunt for affordable
homes.
But
it raises the ire of developers like Mr Steward Leung, chairman of the
Real Estate Developers Association executive committee, who calls it
'irresponsible'.
'If
all 30,000 are for public rental housing, we developers of course
welcome that. But if they are for HOS flats, then the market will be
shaken, definitely.'
Dr
Edward Yiu of the Hong Kong University worries about a possible
unintended impact of having the public sector expanding its role - a
'polarised housing market'. He says: 'Developers would want to maximise
their profits with the less land given, and so will turn them all into
luxury flats.'
Friday, 6 July 2012
Wednesday, 6 June 2012
Malaysian - My First Home Scheme
Skim Rumah Pertamaku (SRP) - My First Home Scheme was first announced in the 2011 Budget by
the Malaysian Government to assist young adults who have just joined
the workforce, earning RM3,000 per month or less to own their first
home.
The Scheme allows young adults to obtain 100% financing from financial institutions, enabling them to own their 1st home without the need to pay a 10% downpayment. This is in line with the Government’s aspirations of increasing home ownership amongst the “rakyat”.
In the 2012 Budget, it was announced that the maximum property value be increased from RM220,000 to RM400,000, effective from 1 January 2012.
Wednesday, 25 April 2012
Affordable Housing: Middle East
Affordable
housing has shot up the Gulf’s policy agenda in the slipstream of the
Arab Spring. Over the past year, governments across the region have
woken up to the fact that putting roofs over people’s heads is central
to the viability of the social compact between state and subject......
...... http://www.thegulfonline.com/Articles.aspx?ArtID=4342
Saturday, 14 April 2012
California's Community Redevelopment Agency
California’s community redevelopment agencies were created in the
1940s to encourage urban renewal. The agencies could acquire property,
including through condemnation, finance infrastructure improvements and
sell the land to private owners at below-market prices. Their
dissolution has thrown into question the fate of hundreds of projects,
including housing developments intended for low- and moderate-income
people.
In California, it is relatively rare for developers to be offered tax abatements, density bonuses and other incentives for building in places that are considered risky. Instead, the redevelopment agencies could use the additional property taxes that were generated by enhancing the value of the land, and this so-called tax increment financing became the primary redevelopment tool. This year the incremental tax would have amounted to $5 billion, or 12 percent of all of the property tax collected throughout the state.
............ http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/11/realestate/commercial/an-uncertain-fate-for-urban-projects-in-california.html?adxnnl=1&ref=realestate&adxnnlx=1334397364-XOV1j+dMvMrkEwBM9V51Yg
In California, it is relatively rare for developers to be offered tax abatements, density bonuses and other incentives for building in places that are considered risky. Instead, the redevelopment agencies could use the additional property taxes that were generated by enhancing the value of the land, and this so-called tax increment financing became the primary redevelopment tool. This year the incremental tax would have amounted to $5 billion, or 12 percent of all of the property tax collected throughout the state.
............ http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/11/realestate/commercial/an-uncertain-fate-for-urban-projects-in-california.html?adxnnl=1&ref=realestate&adxnnlx=1334397364-XOV1j+dMvMrkEwBM9V51Yg
Tuesday, 10 April 2012
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

